Music can move us in the same way as assignments, books, and people do. To understand how music does this, we must understand how to analyze its rhetoric.
To begin, Aristotle defines rhetoric as “the faculty of discovering in any particular case all of the available means of persuasion,” but it can also be described as the art, practice, and study of communication by humans. The study of rhetoric can be broken down into two categories, whose terms were coined by Kant.

Ars and Techne
Techne can be described as the tools of a craft, a practice-based, focused on methods of composing, inventing, and communicating. Forms, sentences, punctuation, words, and technology would all fall under techno. Ars is described as the tool of art and aesthetics. The incorporation of pathos, story-telling, and expression of human vision is the ars element in songs.
The terms ars and techne call in to question of music’s persuasion. How much is due to the emotional appeal, engaging themes that are easy to relate to, the artist’s pathos, etc.? How much is due to the riffs, pauses, and repetition?
Rhetoric in Literature and Writing vs. Musical Rhetoric
Similes, metaphors, ethos, pathos, logos, hyperboles, and other rhetorical devices make poems, speeches, and essays more effective. Rhythm, beats, notes, harmony, and other musical devices help achieve music’s same level of success and persuasion.
In Digital Griots: African American Rhetoric in a Multimedia Age, Adam J. Banks argues that DJing and Emceeing offer parallel models for traditional writing, and the act of mixing different tracks, or blending different beats is the “art of transition and revision.” We use transition and revision in writing and composing often. Mixing music while DJing allows the DJ to manipulate the crowd’s mood and reactions, in the same way, a writer may also “mix” or revise their words to influence the audience to react a certain way.

